← Back to Ongoing Projects

Faultline

Strategic Infrastructure Risk Suite

Faultline — Strategic Infrastructure Risk Suite

Overview

Faultline is a unified strategic infrastructure risk platform that consolidates four domain-specific tools — Orbital Risk Tracker, Global Nuclear Infrastructure Atlas, Cyber Escalation Atlas, and Lunar Mandate Atlas — into a single analytical suite.

Each module translates governance theory into operational platforms across orbital, nuclear, cyber, and lunar domains, connecting conceptual frameworks on legitimacy, authority, and escalation with applied policy questions.

Space SecurityNuclear GovernanceCyber GovernanceEscalation AnalysisStrategic RiskDual-Use GovernanceWeaponised Interdependence

Orbital Risk Tracker

Visit →
Orbital Risk Tracker

Tracking anti-satellite events, proximity operations, GNSS jamming incidents, and cyber-space entanglement. Draws on Jervis’s security dilemma framework and weaponised interdependence theory to support escalation analysis across orbital infrastructure.

ASAT EventsProximity OperationsGNSS JammingCyber-Space EntanglementJervisWeaponised Interdependence

Global Nuclear Infrastructure Atlas

Visit →
Global Nuclear Infrastructure Atlas

Interactive mapping of global civilian nuclear power infrastructure, major accident sites, estimated nuclear arsenals, and associated radiation and health context. Designed for educational and policy use, drawing on sources including IAEA, SIPRI, and WHO data.

Civilian Nuclear PowerAccident SitesNuclear ArsenalsRadiation & HealthIAEASIPRIWHO

Cyber Escalation Atlas

Visit →
Cyber Escalation Atlas

Mapping cyber incidents as expressions of strategic behaviour and governance signals. Engages with Kello’s concept of “unpeace,” attribution frameworks, Schelling’s escalation logic, and the Tallinn Manual 2.0 to contextualise cyber operations within broader strategic analysis.

Cyber IncidentsStrategic BehaviourKelloAttributionSchellingTallinn Manual 2.0Escalation

Lunar Mandate Atlas

Visit →
Lunar Mandate Atlas

Interactive mapping of competing lunar governance frameworks, mandates, and authority architecture. Compares the Artemis Accords and the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) programme, tracing how universalist claims function as legitimation devices and how governance architectures shape permissible action on the Moon.

Lunar GovernanceArtemis AccordsILRSLegitimationAuthority ArchitectureSpace GovernanceMandate Mapping

Technical Stack

Next.jsReactTypeScriptD3.jsLeafletTailwind CSSRechartsVercel